Waterbuck
Kobus ellipsiprymnus
Abstract
Waterbuck Kobus ellipsiprymnus has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2016. Kobus ellipsiprymnus is listed as Least Concern.
The Red List Assessment
IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2016. Kobus ellipsiprymnus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T11035A50189324. Accessed on 15 November 2025.
Population trend
Decreasing
Number of mature individuals
Habitat and ecology
Forest, Savanna, Shrubland, Grassland
Geographic range
-
Extant (resident)
Assessment Information
Global Assessment
IUCN Red List Category and Criteria - Global Assessment
Date assessed
07 January 2016
Year published
2016
Assessment Information in detail
Geographic Range
Native
Extant (resident)
Angola; Benin; Botswana; Burkina Faso; Burundi; Cameroon; Central African Republic; Chad; Congo; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the; Côte d'Ivoire; Eritrea; Eswatini; Ethiopia; Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Kenya; Malawi; Mali; Mozambique; Namibia; Niger; Nigeria; Rwanda; Senegal; Sierra Leone; Somalia; South Africa; South Sudan; Sudan; Tanzania, United Republic of; Togo; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe
Possibly Extinct & Vagrant
Gambia
Number of locations
Upper elevation limit
3,000 metres
Lower elevation limit
0 metres
Geographic Range in detail
Population
Current population trend
Number of mature individuals
Population severely fragmented
No
Continuing decline of mature individuals
Population in detail
Habitat and Ecology
System
Generation length (years)
7.1 years
Congregatory
Movement patterns
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat
Habitat and Ecology in detail
Threats
Biological resource use
- Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals
Threats in detail
Use and Trade
Sport hunting/specimen collecting
Food - human
Use and Trade in detail
Conservation Actions
In-place research and monitoring
- Action Recovery Plan : No
- Systematic monitoring scheme : No
In-place land/water protection
- Conservation sites identified : Yes, over entire range
- Percentage of population protected by PAs : 51-60
- Area based regional management plan : No
- Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes
In-place species management
- Harvest management plan : No
- Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly : No
Conservation Actions in detail
Bibliography
Red List Bibliography
External Data
Images and External Links
Images and External Links in detail
CITES Legislation from Species+
Data source
The information below is from the Species+ website.
CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail
Ex situ data from Species360
Data source
The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS).
Ex situ data from Species360 in detail
Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence
Data source
The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.