Angolan Giraffe

Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis

Abstract

Angolan Giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2018. Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis is listed as Least Concern.


Amendment version

The Red List Assessment i

Marais, A., Fennessy, J., Fennessy, S., Brand, R. & Carter, K. 2020. Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis (amended version of 2018 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T88420726A176393590. Accessed on 12 February 2026.

Language

English

Last assessed

22 February 2018

Scope of assessment

Global

Population trend

Increasing

Number of mature individuals

10,173

Habitat and ecology

Forest, Savanna, Shrubland

Geographic range

    Distribution data is not mapped for this species.

Assessment Information

Global Assessment

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria - Global Assessment

Least Concern  

Date assessed

22 February 2018

Year published

2020

Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

Angola; Botswana; Namibia (Namibia (main part))

Presence Uncertain

Zimbabwe

Extant & Introduced (resident)

Namibia (Caprivi Strip); South Africa

Number of locations

Upper elevation limit

500 metres

Lower elevation limit

100 metres

Geographic Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Increasing

Number of mature individuals

10,173

Population severely fragmented

No

Continuing decline of mature individuals

No

Population in detail

Habitat and Ecology

System

Habitat type

Forest, Savanna, Shrubland

Generation length (years)

10 years

Congregatory

Movement patterns

Not a Migrant

Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat

Habitat and Ecology in detail

Use and Trade

Use and Trade in detail

Conservation Actions

In-place research and monitoring

  • Action Recovery Plan : No

In-place land/water protection

  • Conservation sites identified : Yes, over part of range
  • Area based regional management plan : No
  • Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes
  • Invasive species control or prevention : Not Applicable

In-place species management

  • Harvest management plan : No
  • Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly : Yes
  • Subject to ex-situ conservation : Unknown

In-place education

  • Subject to any international management / trade controls : Yes
Conservation Actions in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography

Amendment

Correction of coded threats: logging and wood harvesting has unintentional effects on the species, rather than the species being intentionally used for this purpose.

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS)

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail