Socotra Freshwater Crab

Socotrapotamon socotrense

Abstract

Socotra Freshwater Crab Socotrapotamon socotrense has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2024. Socotrapotamon socotrense is listed as Endangered under criteria B1ab(i,iii)+2ab(i,iii).

The Red List Assessment i

Van Damme, K. 2025. Socotrapotamon socotrense. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T134507A258464487. Accessed on 14 December 2025.

Last assessed

26 September 2024

Scope of assessment

Global

The Green Status Assessment i

Van Damme, K. 2024. Socotrapotamon socotrense (Green Status assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T134507A13450720252. Accessed on 14 December 2025.

Last assessed

Scope of assessment

Global

Population trend

Unknown

Number of mature individuals

Species recovery score

60% (40% - 80%)

Geographic range

  • Extant (resident)

IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2024. Socotrapotamon socotrense. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-2

Assessment Information

Global Assessment

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria - Global Assessment

Endangered   B1ab(i,iii)+2ab(i,iii)

Date assessed

26 September 2024

Year published

2025

Assessment Information in detail

Green Status Assessment Information

IUCN SPECIES RECOVERY CATEGORY

Moderately Depleted

Species Recovery Score

60% (40% - 80%)

Date assessed

Year published

2024

Conservation impact metrics

Conservation Legacy
Conservation Dependence
Conservation Gain
Recovery Potential
Green Status Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

Yemen (Socotra)

Number of locations

4

Upper depth limit

Lower depth limit

Geographic Range in detail

Indigenous and Expected Additional Range

Benchmark Year

1750

Expected Additional Range

No

Indigenous and Expected Additional Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Unknown

Number of mature individuals

Population severely fragmented

Unknown

Continuing decline of mature individuals

Population in detail

Spatial Units

Spatial Units

Diksam-Shibehon Plateau highland wadis; Haggeher Mountains; Lowland streams in the Hadibo and Manufo plain; Permanent wadis directly north of the Haggeher; Wadis and streams of the eastern-central limestone highlands and large wadis directly east and south of the Haggeher

Number of Spatial Units

5

Spatial Units Definition Method

Combination

Spatial units description

Several considerations were made when delineating spatial units for Socotrapotamon socotrense. These included general large water catchment areas (e.g. eastern Momi Plateau), geomorphology (granite high mountains and limestone plateaus), altitudinal zones, and climatic conditions (e.g. northern wadis connected to the Haggeher). In addition, preliminary molecular data indicating the presence of areas with special genotypes/subpopulations have been taken into account (Van Damme unpubl. data). The spatial units are based on data collected during recent field surveys, allowing a better and updated insight into the species' distribution.

Spatial Units in detail

Habitat and Ecology

Generation length (years)

Congregatory

Movement patterns

Not a Migrant

Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat

Yes

Habitat and Ecology in detail

Ecological Function

Functionality description

Reduced functionality could be determined by low abundance of the species and overabundance its prey (e.g. invasive Arabian Killifish Aphaniops dispar) per wadi-pool, wadi, or stream, as well as the absence of young life stages during reproductive seasons (and overabundance of overmature individuals). However, very little is known about the biology, diet, local migration, and population size (including seasonal variation) of this species, so the indicators of functionality are at this moment theoretical, not based on empirical evidence of the species itself. Understanding of this species is only just starting to improve, and most of the knowledge is not yet published (Apel and Brandis 2000, Van Damme unpubl. data).

Ecological Function in detail

Threats

Residential & commercial development

  • Housing & urban areas
  • Tourism & recreation areas

Agriculture & aquaculture

  • Livestock farming & ranching

Human intrusions & disturbance

  • Work & other activities

Natural system modifications

  • Dams & water management/use

Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases

  • Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases

Pollution

  • Garbage & solid waste

Climate change & severe weather

  • Habitat shifting & alteration
  • Droughts
  • Storms & flooding
Threats in detail

Use and Trade

Use and Trade in detail

Conservation Actions

In-place research and monitoring

  • Action Recovery Plan : No
  • Systematic monitoring scheme : No

In-place land/water protection

  • Conservation sites identified : Yes, over part of range
  • Area based regional management plan : No
  • Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes
  • Invasive species control or prevention : No

In-place species management

  • Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly : No
  • Subject to ex-situ conservation : No

In-place education

  • Subject to recent education and awareness programmes : Yes
  • Included in international legislation : No
  • Subject to any international management / trade controls : No
Conservation Actions in detail

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography
Green Status Bibliography

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS)

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail