Slender Club-rush

Isolepis cernua

Abstract

Slender Club-rush Isolepis cernua has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2008. Isolepis cernua is listed as Least Concern.


The Red List Assessment i

Rhazi, L. 2010. Isolepis cernua (Mediterranean assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T164026A5707579. Accessed on 02 May 2025.

Last assessed

01 September 2008

Scope of assessment

Mediterranean

Population trend

Stable

Number of mature individuals

Habitat and ecology

Geographic range

  • Extant (resident)

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 2010. Isolepis cernua. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1

Assessment Information

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria

Least Concern  

Date assessed

01 September 2008

Year published

2010

Annotations

Needs updating

Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

Algeria; Croatia; Cyprus; France; Greece; Israel; Italy; Lebanon; Libya; Montenegro; Morocco; North Macedonia; Portugal; Spain; Syrian Arab Republic; Tunisia; Türkiye

Presence Uncertain

Albania

Number of locations

Upper elevation limit

Lower elevation limit

Upper depth limit

Lower depth limit

Geographic Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Stable

Number of mature individuals

Population severely fragmented

No

Continuing decline of mature individuals

Population in detail

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS).

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail