Eastern Box Turtle

Terrapene carolina

Abstract

Eastern Box Turtle Terrapene carolina has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2010. Terrapene carolina is listed as Vulnerable under criteria A2bcde+4bcde.


The Red List Assessment i

van Dijk, P.P. 2011. Terrapene carolina (errata version published in 2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T21641A97428179. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T21641A9303747.en. Accessed on 29 April 2025.

Last assessed

01 August 2010

Scope of assessment

Global

Population trend

Decreasing

Number of mature individuals

Habitat and ecology

Forest, Shrubland, Wetlands (inland), Artificial/Terrestrial

Geographic range

    Distribution data is not mapped for this species.

Assessment Information

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria

Vulnerable   A2bcde+4bcde

Date assessed

01 August 2010

Year published

2011

Annotations

Needs updating

Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

Canada; Mexico; United States

Number of locations

Upper elevation limit

Lower elevation limit

Upper depth limit

Lower depth limit

Geographic Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Decreasing

Number of mature individuals

Population severely fragmented

No

Continuing decline of mature individuals

Population in detail

Threats

Residential & commercial development

  • Housing & urban areas
  • Commercial & industrial areas
  • Tourism & recreation areas

Agriculture & aquaculture

  • Annual & perennial non-timber crops
  • Wood & pulp plantations

Biological resource use

  • Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals

Natural system modifications

  • Fire & fire suppression

Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases

  • Problematic native species/diseases

Pollution

  • Agricultural & forestry effluents

Climate change & severe weather

  • Habitat shifting & alteration
  • Temperature extremes
Threats in detail

Conservation Actions

In-place research and monitoring

  • Action Recovery Plan : No
  • Systematic monitoring scheme : No

In-place land/water protection

  • Conservation sites identified : Yes, over entire range
  • Area based regional management plan : No
  • Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes
  • Invasive species control or prevention : No

In-place species management

  • Harvest management plan : No
  • Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly : No
  • Subject to ex-situ conservation : No

In-place education

  • Included in international legislation : Yes
  • Subject to any international management / trade controls : Yes
Conservation Actions in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography

Errata

An errata assessment is required to generate a revised PDF without the range map which had been included in error; no range map was available when this assessment was originally published.

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS).

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail