Bornean Orangutan

Pongo pygmaeus

Abstract

Bornean Orangutan Pongo pygmaeus has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2016. Pongo pygmaeus is listed as Critically Endangered under criteria A4abcd.


The Red List Assessment i

Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A.J., Meijaard, E., Wich , S.A. & Husson, S. 2024. Pongo pygmaeus (amended version of 2023 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T17975A259043172. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2024-1.RLTS.T17975A259043172.en. Accessed on 29 April 2025.

Last assessed

08 February 2016

Scope of assessment

Global

Population trend

Decreasing

Number of mature individuals

Habitat and ecology

Forest

Geographic range

  • Extant & Introduced (resident)

  • Extant (resident)

  • Possibly Extant (resident)

Meijaard, E., Ni’Matullah, S, Dennis, R.A., Ancrenaz, M., Sherman, J. and Wich, S.A. 2023. Spatial data for P. pygmaeus Red Listing. Borneo Futures, Brunei Darussalam 2023. Pongo pygmaeus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1

Assessment Information

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria

Critically Endangered   A4abcd

Date assessed

08 February 2016

Year published

2024

Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

Indonesia; Malaysia

Presence Uncertain & Origin Uncertain

Brunei Darussalam

Number of locations

Upper elevation limit

500 metres

Lower elevation limit

0 metres

Geographic Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Decreasing

Number of mature individuals

Population severely fragmented

Yes

Continuing decline of mature individuals

Yes

Population in detail

Habitat and Ecology

System

Habitat type

Forest

Generation length (years)

25 years

Congregatory

Movement patterns

Not a Migrant

Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat

Yes

Habitat and Ecology in detail

Conservation Actions

In-place research and monitoring

  • Action Recovery Plan : No
  • Systematic monitoring scheme : No

In-place land/water protection

  • Conservation sites identified : Yes, over part of range
  • Percentage of population protected by PAs : 31-40
  • Area based regional management plan : Yes
  • Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes

In-place species management

  • Harvest management plan : No

In-place education

  • Included in international legislation : Yes
  • Subject to any international management / trade controls : Yes
Conservation Actions in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography

Amendment

This amended version of the 2016 assessment was created to update the supplementary information. Previous corrected assessments were created to update the distribution map.

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS).

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail