Beech Marten

Martes foina

Abstract

Beech Marten Martes foina has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2015. Martes foina is listed as Least Concern.


The Red List Assessment i

Abramov, A.V., Kranz, A., Herrero, J., Choudhury, A.U. & Maran, T. 2024. Martes foina (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T29672A259348828. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2024-2.RLTS.T29672A259348828.en. Accessed on 09 May 2025.

Last assessed

03 March 2015

Scope of assessment

Global

Population trend

Stable

Number of mature individuals

Habitat and ecology

Forest, Shrubland, Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks), Artificial/Terrestrial

Geographic range

  • Extant (resident)

IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2016. Martes foina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1

Assessment Information

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria

Least Concern  

Date assessed

03 March 2015

Year published

2024

Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

Afghanistan; Albania; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bhutan; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; China; Croatia; Czechia; Denmark; Estonia; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; India; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Iraq; Israel; Italy; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kyrgyzstan; Latvia; Lebanon; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Moldova; Mongolia; Montenegro; Nepal; Netherlands; North Macedonia; Pakistan; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Switzerland; Syrian Arab Republic; Tajikistan; Turkmenistan; Türkiye; Ukraine; Uzbekistan

Extant & Introduced (resident)

United States

Number of locations

Upper elevation limit

4,200 metres

Lower elevation limit

0 metres

Geographic Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Stable

Number of mature individuals

Population severely fragmented

No

Continuing decline of mature individuals

No

Population in detail

Use and Trade

Use and Trade in detail

Conservation Actions

In-place research and monitoring

  • Action Recovery Plan : No
  • Systematic monitoring scheme : No

In-place land/water protection

  • Conservation sites identified : No
  • Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes
  • Invasive species control or prevention : Not Applicable

In-place species management

  • Harvest management plan : No
  • Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly : Unknown
  • Subject to ex-situ conservation : No

In-place education

  • Subject to recent education and awareness programmes : Unknown
  • Included in international legislation : Yes
  • Subject to any international management / trade controls : Yes
Conservation Actions in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography

Amendment

This amended assessment was published to correct the name of an assessor from "Choudhury, A." to "Choudhury, A.U.". In addition, minor formatting errors in the Taxonomic Notes have been corrected.

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS).

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail

Online attention

Data source

The information below is from Altmetric.

Online attention metrics from Altmetric in detail