Keketerehe

Macrolearia chathamica

Abstract

Keketerehe Macrolearia chathamica has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2023. Macrolearia chathamica is listed as Endangered under criteria A4ace.


The Red List Assessment i

de Lange, P. 2025. Macrolearia chathamica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T34301A243965247. Accessed on 03 May 2025.

Last assessed

03 September 2023

Scope of assessment

Global

Population trend

Decreasing

Number of mature individuals

20,000

Habitat and ecology

Forest, Wetlands (inland), Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)

Geographic range

  • Extant (resident)

Global Tree Assessment 2024. Macrolearia chathamica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1

Assessment Information

IUCN Red List Category and Criteria

Endangered   A4ace

Date assessed

03 September 2023

Year published

2025

Assessment Information in detail

Geographic Range

Native

Extant (resident)

New Zealand

Number of locations

Upper elevation limit

230 metres

Lower elevation limit

2 metres

Geographic Range in detail

Population

Current population trend

Decreasing

Number of mature individuals

20,000

Population severely fragmented

Continuing decline of mature individuals

Population in detail

Conservation Actions

In-place land/water protection

  • Occurs in at least one protected area : Yes

In-place species management

  • Subject to ex-situ conservation : Yes
Conservation Actions in detail

Bibliography

Red List Bibliography

External Data

CITES Legislation from Species+

Data source

The information below is from the Species+ website.

CITES Legislation from Species+ in detail

Ex situ data from Species360

Data source

The information below is from Species360's Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS).

Ex situ data from Species360 in detail

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence

Data source

The information below is from the Conservation Evidence website.

Studies and Actions from Conservation Evidence in detail